
When addressing difficulties with task organisation, planning, and follow-through in adults with ADHD, high-tech solutions are often recommended first. However, clinical experience and theory suggest that low-tech strategies are frequently more effective than app-based or “smart” solutions.
The resources and templates provided on this website are intended for general informational purposes only. They are not intended to serve as professional advice, clinical guidance, or definitive practice standards. By downloading this resource, you agree to our terms and conditions.
When addressing difficulties with task organisation, planning, and follow-through in adults with ADHD, high-tech solutions are often recommended first. However, clinical experience and theory suggest that low-tech strategies are frequently more effective than app-based or “smart” solutions.
This article outlines why high-tech tools may undermine executive functioning in ADHD, and why low-tech and mid-tech alternatives often provide more reliable support at the point of performance.
Smartphones, tablets, and laptops are designed to capture and hold attention. Their interfaces are intentionally engaging, adaptive, and increasingly personalised through artificial intelligence. For individuals with ADHD—who already struggle with attentional regulation—this creates a fundamental mismatch.
Key limitations of high-tech tools include:

Smart devices are inherently distracting. Even when used for planning or time management, they present competing stimuli such as notifications, alerts, messages, and internet access. These features frequently derail task initiation and persistence.
Modern technology actively tracks user behaviour and adapts content to maximise engagement. Over time, this increases attentional pull and reduces the likelihood that the device will be used solely for its intended organisational purpose.
Despite the abundance of ADHD-focused apps, most lack empirical evidence supporting their effectiveness. Reviews of the literature consistently show minimal or no research validating these tools for improving executive functioning in ADHD.
High-tech tools must be physically present, charged, and functional to be useful. Devices and charging cables are easily forgotten, misplaced, or depleted—rendering the system ineffective precisely when support is needed.
A central concept in ADHD management is the point of performance: the physical and temporal context in which a task must be completed.
For organisational aids to be effective, they must be:
High-tech tools often fail on this criterion. Even when present, they introduce competing activities that interfere with task completion.
Low-tech tools externalise information in a way that directly supports working memory and self-regulation. They are simple, reliable, and free from competing demands on attention.
Sticky notes are particularly effective because they:
External cues consistently outperform memory-based strategies in ADHD.
Paper journals support:
They reduce reliance on working memory while supporting planning and prioritisation.

Physical to-do lists—daily or weekly—can be helpful when used flexibly. While not suitable for everyone, they allow tasks to be externalised and reviewed without digital distraction.
Week-at-a-glance or day-planner formats are especially useful because they:
This structure supports time awareness, a common area of difficulty in ADHD.
Some tools offer technological support without the attentional costs of smart devices.
Standalone recorders allow users to:
While battery-dependent, they avoid the addictive features of smartphones.
Smart pens combine handwritten notes with audio recording, allowing users to:
These tools are particularly beneficial for students and professionals who must process large volumes of spoken information.
From an executive function perspective, external information has greater control over behaviour than internal memory. Low-tech tools succeed because they:
In ADHD, the environment must do more of the work that internal executive control cannot reliably perform.
While high-tech organisational tools are appealing, they often conflict with the core cognitive challenges of ADHD. Low-tech and mid-tech strategies—paper-based, visible, and context-bound—are frequently more effective because they align with how executive functioning operates in ADHD.
Clinicians should consider recommending:
Effective ADHD management is less about innovation and more about placing the right supports in the right place at the right time.

0 Comments